Americans continue to owe more on their car loans than their vehicle is worth in record numbers. According to the latest vehicle transaction data from Edmunds, in the second quarter of 2026, consumers trading in their vehicle on a new-vehicle purchases continue to carry record amounts of negative equity on their existing loans. (Negative equity is also called being "underwater" or "upside down". Car Pro Show host Jerry Reynolds explains what to do if you find yourself in this situation in his advice article here. )
Edmunds second quarter 2026 data reveals:
"Consumers are incurring more debt than ever when trading in vehicles that are underwater," said Jessica Caldwell, Edmunds' head of insights. "Buyers who financed at 2022's peak prices are starting to come back to trade in, and they're bringing thousands of dollars in old debt with them. With interest rates still elevated, this is creating a costly snowball effect for consumers. As buyers roll over their negative equity, their new loan principals swell. Relying on longer loan terms as a coping mechanism to keep monthly payments down only causes total interest charges to be higher in the long run."
Edmunds says its analysts conducted an analysis of the models holding the highest volumes of negative equity as trade-ins in Q2 2026. Their findings reveal that even highly regarded vehicles known for holding their resale value are not immune to financing challenges. The list features popular trucks and SUVs, alongside traditional residual winners:
| Trade-In Model | Average Model Year as Trade-In in Q2 |
Average Negative Equity |
| Chevrolet Silverado 1500 | 2021.9 | -$8,516 |
| Ford F-150 | 2021.1 | -$8,417 |
| Toyota Camry | 2023.1 | -$7,030 |
| Ram 1500 | 2021.6 | -$8,347 |
| Nissan Rogue | 2022.0 | -$7,260 |
| Honda CR-V | 2023.0 | -$4,722 |
| Toyota Tacoma | 2023.2 | -$7,793 |
| Chevrolet Equinox | 2021.9 | -$5,668 |
| Honda Accord | 2022.2 | -$5,127 |
| Toyota Corolla | 2022.8 | -$6,191 |
| GMC Sierra 1500 | 2022.2 | -$8,568 |
| Honda Civic | 2022.6 | -$4,778 |
| Ford Explorer | 2021.2 | -$7,689 |
| Toyota RAV4 | 2022.6 | -$6,815 |
| Hyundai Tucson | 2022.5 | -$5,532 |
| Jeep Wrangler | 2020.0 | -$7,867 |
| Toyota Tundra | 2023.4 | -$8,929 |
| Kia Sportage | 2023.0 | -$5,568 |
| Chevrolet Traverse | 2021.9 | -$6,962 |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2020.6 | -$7,357 |
"It's easy to assume negative equity is just a story about vehicles that depreciate quickly, but some of the biggest dollar losses we're seeing are on trucks and sedans that traditionally hold their value better than most," said Ivan Drury, Edmunds' director of insights. "When historically safe residual value bets are showing up underwater, it's clear this is a financing problem, not always a vehicle choice problem. These examples are a harsh reminder that a great vehicle choice can still be completely undermined by a punishing loan structure."
For car owners considering a new-vehicle purchase, Edmunds experts recommend that they review their loan payoff amount and compare it to their vehicle's current trade-in value to understand if they're underwater, a crucial first step in making more informed auto-related finance decisions.
Shoppers can proactively manage their auto debt by using Edmunds' free appraisal tool to identify their current vehicle's value and track its shifting value history over time here on Edmunds. For consumers who are underwater on their existing loan but in the market for a new car, Edmunds analysts suggest prioritizing a long-term fit over any short-term incentives.
"Selecting a vehicle that fits your needs with the right financing terms will save more money in the long run than chasing any temporary manufacturer discounts or dealership incentives," said Drury.
| Year | Share of New Vehicles Purchased with a Trade-in |
Share of Trade-ins with Negative Equity |
Average Amount of Negative Equity |
Average Trade-in Age(Years) |
| 2026 | 46.2% | 29.6% | -$6,884 | 4.0 |
| 2025 | 45.7% | 26.6% | -$6,754 | 3.8 |
| 2024 | 44.8% | 23.9% | -$6,255 | 3.7 |
| 2023 | 46.2% | 17.3% | -$5,543 | 3.4 |
| 2022 | 46.8% | 14.7% | -$4,487 | 3.2 |
| 2021 | 50.8% | 23.1% | -$4,246 | 3.6 |
| 2020 | 45.6% | 37.2% | -$5,845 | 3.9 |
| 2019 | 44.6% | 34.6% | -$5,317 | 3.8 |
Photo Credit: DuxX/Shutterstock.com.