In a significant turn for the automotive sector, the federal government has simultaneously expanded tariffs on commercial vehicles and parts while extending relief efforts for domestic vehicle and engine manufacturers. The latest actions, signed into force in mid-October, signal a dual-track strategy: tougher on imports and more generous to U.S. production.
On October 17, the President issued a proclamation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 that imposes a 25 percent ad valorem duty on imported medium- and heavy-duty trucks (Classes 3-8) and specified parts, and a 10 percent duty on imported buses, effective for goods entered after 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on November 1. The move expands previous tariffs beyond passenger vehicles and light trucks to large commercial units, citing concerns about national security and domestic manufacturing erosion.
At the same time, the administration extended and enhanced the existing tariff relief program for U.S.-assembled vehicles and engines. Automakers will now be eligible for an import-adjustment offset of 3.75 percent of the manufacturer’s suggested retail price of a qualifying U.S.-assembled vehicle through 2030. Engine manufacturers assembling in the U.S. are similarly included. The relief program was previously slated to expire in 2027.
Industry groups are warning of further tariff risks for equipment and production inputs. On October 22, major automakers and trade associations urged the administration not to impose tariffs on factory robotics and machinery, arguing that such levies would raise production costs, delay expansions of U.S. plants, and push vehicle prices even higher at a time when they are already elevated.
Economic analysis suggests the 2025 tariff regime could push vehicle prices higher by around 9 percent in the short run, roughly the equivalent of an extra $4,500 on an average car. The same projections estimate that consumer welfare losses from the tariffs could approach $1,500 per household this year.
The implications for the auto industry are far-reaching. For import-dependent manufacturers and fleets that rely on Mexican or other non-U.S. production of heavy vehicles, the scope of cost exposure just widened. Yet for automakers with strong U.S. assembly operations, the updated offset offers a clearer advantage. Suppliers are being urged to reassess sourcing, classification of parts, and production footprints to avoid cascading duty burdens.
Companies are accelerating localization and capacity investments in the United States, aligning with the incentive structure behind the offset program. At the same time, some automakers are conducting internal audits of procurement, logistics, and trade-compliance processes to ensure they meet the documentation and content-eligibility thresholds set out in the new proclamation.
The auto trade landscape is evolving from broad-based tariffs on cars and parts into a more complex mix of commercial-vehicle duties, production credits, and compliance rules. For manufacturers and suppliers, the key takeaway is that where you build and what you import now matter more than ever. Imports are subject to heightened scrutiny and duties, and U.S. assembly now carries distinct, measurable benefits.
Photo Credit: Lightspring/Shutterstock.com